EMRs for specialists: physicians take the helm.
نویسنده
چکیده
E822 CMAJ, December 10, 2013, 185(18) © 2013 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors The invitation extended to Dr. Vandana Ahluwalia to purchase an electronic medical records system for her Brampton, Ontario, rheumatology practice was both welcome and challenging. On the one hand, the offer came with a tantalizing cash incentive — up to $28 000 in free money from the Ontario and federal governments. On the other hand, Ahluwalia had to choose between 13 commercial systems. “It was overwhelming,” she recalls. “The selection range was incredibly complicated.” To make matters even more daunting, Ahluwalia soon learned that none of the electronic medical record (EMR) systems approved for government funding by OntarioMD (a subsidiary of the Ontario Medical Association funded by eHealth Ontario) was designed with her needs as a specialist in mind. “The EMR systems are geared toward family practitioners,” she explains. “Specialty-specific tools require customization.” The experience made Ahluwalia realize that part of the reason Canadian specialists have been slower than general physicians in adopting EMRs is that they require customized systems that can meet their specific and often very exacting clinical needs, while being able to share information with off-the-shelf EMRs used by generalists. It’s a problem, Ahluwalia concluded, that can’t be solved by e-health bureaucrats and software vendors. “We specialists have to solve this for ourselves,” she explains. To cut through the confusion, Ahluwalia and colleagues from the Ontario Rheumatology Association, where she was president at the time, swiftly reduced the list of possible systems to two. She also mapped out an EMR customization process based on a standardized checklist that allows other rheumatologists to efficiently set up and modify their systems. Within 18 months, more than half of Ontario’s rheumatologists were using the process to install their EMRs. Ahluwalia’s next move was to suggest to OntarioMD that it begin using her model to help specialists in other fields — a suggestion its CEO, Brian Forster, accepted enthusiastically. The system is now being piloted with pediatricians and ophthalmologists, he says. With more than 80% of Ontario family physicians eligible for EMR subsidies using the systems, the big challenge now is to persuade more specialists to adopt them, says Forster, who estimates that only half of Ontario specialists use EMRs. And to increase that number, he adds, physician leaders like Ahluwahlia are instrumental. “Vendors have been quite receptive but need well-defined requirements from specialists,” he explains. “To get them, you need strong leaders like her.” Thanks to such leaders, more specialists across Canada have, in fact, been flocking to take advantage of subsidy programs before they expire. “The rate of EMR funding for specialists is going through the roof,” says Jeremy Smith, program director for British Columbia’s Physician Information Technology Office, which supports doctors in collaborating to form “communities of practice” to select, implement and use EMRS. As with Ahluwalia’s leadership in Ontario, key specialists in BC are now leading the process, says Smith. “Although specialists don’t tend to naturally coalesce around a common plan, they’re coming together at the microlevel,” he says, describing a group of more than 30 cardiologists at Vancouver General Hospital who recently adopted EMRs. As more specialists come on board, the challenge then becomes connecting them to systems installed by family practitioners and other clinicians capable of electronically transmitting specialist referrals, prescriptions, and lab and hospital reports. “The biggest problem in getting specialists to work together and adopt EMRs is getting them to agree on common sets of information needs,” explains Bill Pascal, chief technology officer for the Canadian Medical Association. “I would encourage all specialty groups to map out common needs from the systems.” As in Ontario, connecting general practitioners and specialists remains a huge challenge in BC. To help address that challenge, physicians will have to roll up their sleeves and get under the hoods of their machines, says Dr. Bruce Hobson, lead physician for an EMR community of practice in Powell River, BC. “It’s all about getting physicians to change their way of thinking about using the EMRs to assist in clinical decisionmaking and team work,” he says. “Until you have true interoperability everything is just a big work-around.” — Paul Christopher Webster, Toronto, Ont.
منابع مشابه
Trends in the use of electronic medical records.
A comparison between the results of the 2007 and the 2010 National Physician Survey (NPS) shows that exclusive use of electronic medical records (EMRs) by family physicians, general physicians, and other specialists across Canada has increased from 10% to 16%. The province of Alberta leads the way with 28% of physicians exclusively using EMRs, followed by Ontario (20%) and British Columbia (19%...
متن کاملUse of electronic medical records: reminders and decision aids for chronic disease management.
Results of the 2007 National Physician Survey (NPS) show that 81.6% of FPs and GPs believe managing patients with chronic diseases increases the demand on time. Managing these patients can be complex and requires regular monitoring of health status indicators and ongoing reviews of treatment options. Some have suggested that the use of electronic medical records (EMRs) programmed to provide dis...
متن کاملComparing Perceptions and Use of a Commercial Electronic Medical Record (EMR) between Primary Care and Subspecialty Physicians
Introduction Electronic medical records (EMRs) are gaining increasing prominence in the delivery of healthcare although the focus is primarily on deploying EMRs. Relatively little research has studied the postimplementation of commercial EMRs. Here we present the results of a web-based survey comparing primary care providers (PCPs) and sub-specialists (SSs) in our tertiary care health system. T...
متن کاملDo electronic medical records improve quality of care? No.
YES Electronic medical records (EMRs) have had a positive effect on patient care and the work lives of family physicians. Over the past few decades our medical knowledge has increased. More investigative and treatment options are available; as a result our patients are living longer and we are dealing with more chronic conditions. Family physicians cannot “know all things” nor can we be “all th...
متن کاملPhysician Characteristics Associated with Early Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in Smaller Group Practices
To examine physician characteristics and practice patterns associated with the adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) in smaller group practices. Primary care physicians in Kentucky were surveyed regarding their use of EMRs. Respondents were asked if their practice had fully implemented, partially implemented, or not implemented EMRs. Of the 482 physicians surveyed, the rate of EMR adopt...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne
دوره 185 18 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013